USPTO serial 99915502
HYENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, CAILE MAUREEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HYENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W Olympic Blvd9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; Tea-based beverages; Hibiscus tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; Fruit teas; Herbal teas; Mixes for making tea; Tea-based beverages also containing fruit, herbs, roots, leaves, breaches, or minerals | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Soft drinks flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages also containing fruit, herbs, roots, leaves, breaches, or minerals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |