USPTO serial 99918724
PEST INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 135
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEST INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Paul, MN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Kindel
Christopher M. Kindel Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Pest control for commercial buildings; Pest control services, other than for agriculture, aquaculture, horticulture and forestry | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2025 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collecting, integrating, analyzing, reporting, viewing, and sharing data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing information and insights in order to generate reports; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring, managing, and optimizing the treatment and elimination of pests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for identifying, monitoring, tracking, and reporting pest presence, pest activity, and pest activity trends; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing recommended actions for the treatment and elimination of pests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating regulatory compliance information and insights in the field of pests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating and sending alerts and notifications related to pests and the treatment and elimination of pests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for connecting to pest elimination devices | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |