USPTO serial 99921875
CDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Pappas
George Pappas Barrett McNagny LLP215 East Berry StreetFort Wayne, IN 46802United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | abrasive tools, superabrasive tools, grinding tools, cutting tools, power tools, hand tools, industrial diamond tools, cubic boron nitride tools, lapping tools and machine tools, grinding wheels, dressers, diamond rolls, saw blades, arbors, band saw blades, hole saws, routers, grinding pins, cone wheels, ball grinding pins, plated wheels, needle files, dressing sticks, core drills, drill heads, drill bits, ground wheel adapters and spindle drives, mirror film, lapping film, polishing film, clusters, phono points | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |