USPTO serial 99975309
SKAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter H. Ajemian
Peter H. Ajemian Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP100 N. City Parkway, Suite 1600Las Vegas, NV 89106United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of production of motion pictures, videos and multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production, distribution, and post-production of motion pictures; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Entertainment media production services for motion pictures, television and Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in software development and machine learning; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in software development and machine learning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in software development and machine learning; Design and development of virtual reality software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |