USPTO serial 99975393
METROPOLITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 802
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METROPOLITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Metropolitan Bath & Tile, Inc.
Upper Marlboro, MD, US
Metropolitan Bath & Tile, Inc.
Upper Marlboro, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. May
David L. May Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street, NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building remodeling and repair; Bathroom construction, remodeling and repair; Providing information and consulting services in the field of building construction, remodeling and repair; Providing information and consulting services in the field of bathroom remodeling and repair | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 1990 |
| 042 | Interior design; Designing of bathrooms; Providing information in the field of interior design; Providing information in the field of bathroom design | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |