USPTO serial 99975953
QEXTRACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 807Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBBLE,JENNA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with QEXTRACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nicholasville, KY, US
Nicholasville, KY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Hardy
Kristin H. Hardy Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP115 Madison Street, Suite 700Dayton, OH 45402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical diagnostic reagents for scientific purposes; Chemical reagents for scientific research purposes; DNA/RNA extraction kit comprised primarily of chemical reagents for extracting specimen DNA/RNA for scientific research purposes | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2024 |
| 005 | Chemical reagents for medical purposes; Medical diagnostic reagents; Diagnostic preparations for medical purposes; DNA/RNA extraction kit comprised primarily of chemical reagents for extracting specimen DNA/RNA for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |