USPTO serial 99976035
STABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 819
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Matkov
Matthew Matkov Matkov Clark P.C.2618 San Miguel Dr.Ste 418Newport Beach, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for deploying, managing, and bridging stablecoin-native blockchain applications; Hosting decentralized software applications; Providing online, non-downloadable application programming interface (API) software for collecting, verifying, and transmitting information via a blockchain data feed to smart contracts using stablecoin based transaction fees; Software development services in the field of stablecoin Layer 1 blockchains, namely, bridging, token routing, and consensus-based processing; software as a service services featuring software for creating and managing network validator nodes for use with decentralized computer networks. | ACTIVE | Dec 8, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |